Silent Dissolution: How the United States Is Dismantling China's Model Without Firing a Single Missile

Thesis

The confrontation between the United States and China is not being fought with tanks or speeches. It is unfolding through a structural, surgical, and gradual dismantling of the pillars sustaining China’s economic and political model. This process is not about containment or negotiation — it’s about strategically disabling China’s operational core without resorting to open warfare.

Strategic Breakdown

1. Global Tariffs: A Legal Scalpel with a Selective Target

When the U.S. imposed tariffs of up to 145% on key Chinese products — later temporarily reduced to 30% following a 90-day agreement — the official narrative focused on protecting domestic industry from unfair practices.
But the broader effect was surgical: by applying the tariffs globally, the U.S. avoided WTO retaliation while quietly suffocating China’s export engine.

Reference: USTR – 2024 Tariff Update (ustr.gov)

2. Iran and Russia: Cutting Off China’s Energy Lifeline

China's industrial rise depends heavily on long-term access to hydrocarbons.

• Iran, a historic ally, is increasingly cornered by U.S. and Israeli pressure, limiting its capacity to export oil to China.

• Russia, while publicly aligned with China, did not receive significant military support from Beijing during the war in Ukraine. Instead, it turned to North Korea for weapons — a subtle but telling fracture in the alliance.
  This increases logistical friction and drives up energy costs for China, directly impacting its manufacturing model.

References:

Reuters – Russia seeks ammunition from North Korea

Al Jazeera – Iran-China strategic partnership

3. Industrial Exodus: The Quiet Withdrawal of Multinationals

Major players like Samsung and Apple are pulling operations out of China in favor of India, Vietnam, and Mexico. Rising wages, political risk, and regulatory pressure have triggered a silent but accelerating exodus.
China is losing jobs, foreign investment, and structural trust — all at once.

Reference: Financial Times – Multinationals exit China

4. Internal Disruption: Is the Party Cracking from Within?

Signs of tension are emerging inside the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Some analysts speculate that U.S. intelligence agencies, directly or through proxies, may be backing anti-Xi factions within the party.
If Xi loses internal control, the regime’s coherence collapses — and with it, China’s global positioning.

Reference: Council on Foreign Relations – China’s internal dissent

5. China Won’t Be Japan. It Could Be Yugoslavia.

In 1985, the U.S. signed the Plaza Accord with Japan, forcing yen appreciation and industrial decline. Japan accepted subordination — and survived.
But China is different.
The working hypothesis among many strategic circles is that Washington will not allow a unified, industrially sovereign China to remain intact.
A potential outcome: territorial fragmentation — Xinjiang, Tibet, Guangdong, and others — as a way to permanently dilute centralized power.

Reference: Stratfor – China's Future as a Unified State

6. Industrial Implosion: BYD and the Overproduction Trap

BYD, once the flagship of China’s electric vehicle dominance, now faces international saturation.
Dealerships in Latin America and Europe are collapsing under unsold inventory.

• In Mexico and Chile, importers are defaulting on debt.

• In Europe, vehicles face regulatory hurdles, rising competition, and poor after-sales infrastructure.
  Meanwhile, China’s own export numbers are falling, and the domestic market is saturated.
  The symbol of success has become a liability. The production engine, unable to decelerate, begins to devour itself.

References:

Bloomberg – BYD’s Export Challenges

El País – Distributors in Mexico and Chile face difficulties with Chinese EVs

Conclusion

The U.S. is not waging war against China. It is allowing China’s own model to break from within.
By blocking access to energy, restricting export channels, pressuring foreign investment, and nurturing internal fractures, the U.S. is forcing a slow, bloodless collapse.
This is not containment. It is silent dissolution.

Methodological Note

This article is part of the ongoing geopolitical risk mapping conducted by the BioPharma Business Intelligence Unit (BBIU).
The scenarios presented do not constitute predictions, but structural models for high-volatility dynamics.

This article is part of a larger collection at the BioPharma Business Intelligence Unit,
where we publish deep-dive analysis on operational failure, regulatory exposure, and market fragility in the Korean biopharma sector.
Access full articles here: biopharmabusinessintelligenceunit.com/articles

“🧠 Cognitive Efficiency Mode: Activated”
“♻️ Token Economy: High”
“⚠️ Risk of Cognitive Flattening if Reused Improperly”