Perceived Value, Price, and the Global Marketing Divide: China, Korea, and USA/EU
Click here to hear in Youtube: https://youtu.be/m06u6nZ_W4w
1. Introduction
In every industry—biopharma, technology, devices, or consumer goods—companies face the same central question: how do customers perceive value?
Too often, employees and managers attempt to reduce this complex equation to a single lever: price. Lowering price is seen as the fastest and simplest way to boost perceived value and win customers.
Yet this shortcut comes at a high cost. In the short term, it may generate sales, but in the medium and long term it erodes margins, brand equity, innovation, and ultimately trust. This trap is universal, but the consequences vary depending on product type—one-time use vs. continuous-use—and the geographic marketing culture of the seller (China, Korea, USA/EU).
2. Perceived Value: More Than Price
Perceived value can be expressed as a simple relationship:
PerceivedValue=PerceivedBenefits–PerceivedCostsPerceived Value = Perceived Benefits – Perceived CostsPerceivedValue=PerceivedBenefits–PerceivedCosts
Customers calculate this balance not only rationally but across multiple dimensions:
Functional benefits: performance, quality, reliability, safety.
Emotional benefits: trust, prestige, assurance of long-term support.
Contextual factors: comparisons with competitors, reputation of the brand, recommendations from peers or authorities.
When employees equate perceived value with price alone, they ignore that customers evaluate products across functional, emotional, and symbolic layers of meaning.
3. The Price-Only Switch: Consequences
When price becomes the only lever, the trajectory is predictable:
Medium-term consequences:
Margins erode as every competitor undercuts the next.
Customers develop only transactional loyalty, switching instantly for cheaper alternatives.
Innovation slows, as there is no room to reinvest.
Long-term consequences:
Products are commoditized, losing all differentiation.
The company’s reputation shifts from trusted to “cheap.”
Survival depends solely on cost structures, not value creation.
This is the “commodity trap”: a downward spiral from which very few companies escape.
4. Product Type Matters: One-Time Use vs. Continuous Use
The punishment for relying solely on price differs dramatically between consumables and devices/machinery.
Consumables (one-time use):
Examples: medical supplies, syringes, reagents, generic drugs.
Customers purchase frequently, compare constantly, and switch easily.
Price-only competition leads to immediate margin erosion.
Survivors are only those with extreme economies of scale.
Devices and machinery (continuous use):
Examples: diagnostic machines, hospital equipment, laboratory devices.
Customers evaluate based on total cost of ownership (TCO): purchase + maintenance + downtime risk.
Price may win the initial sale, but poor service or reliability destroys value perception over time.
The company loses not through instant price wars, but through erosion of trust and reputation.
Key difference:
For consumables, the punishment for a price-only strategy is instant (low margins).
For devices, the punishment is delayed but severe (loss of trust and lost future sales).
5. After-Sales Service (AS): The Critical Divider
Customers know that price is never the full story. What happens after the sale determines real value—especially in continuous-use products.
China
Customer perception: “If something breaks, there is no real support.”
Reality: spare parts limited, warranties difficult to enforce, service often nonexistent.
Result: acceptable for consumables (easy replacement), catastrophic for devices.
Korea
Customer perception: “Support exists, but not always at global standard.”
Reality: generally reliable service, but global coverage uneven; spare parts sometimes delayed.
Result: effective when products are robust; risky when intensive support is required.
USA/EU
Customer perception: “I pay more, but I am covered.”
Reality: strong global service networks, spare parts pipelines, preventive maintenance contracts, technical training, certification.
Result: trust is reinforced even if products fail, because support validates the premium price.
6. Marketing Models: Three Global Approaches
The marketing approach of each region reflects its structural strengths and weaknesses.
China – Transactional Marketing
Central lever: price and speed.
Narrative: “The same product as the West, but cheaper.”
Tactics: mass catalogs, trade fairs, B2B platforms, low emphasis on brand building.
Weakness: little symbolic capital; poor resonance in high-risk industries like biopharma or advanced devices.
Korea – Balance Marketing
Central lever: competitive price combined with improved quality.
Narrative: “Better than China, more accessible than USA/EU.”
Tactics: leverage “K-tech” or “K-bio” branding, trade fairs, case studies (Samsung, Hyundai, Celltrion) as anchors of credibility.
Weakness: limited symbolic power globally; often perceived as the “middle option.”
USA/EU – Symbolic Marketing
Central lever: innovation, trust, and brand authority.
Narrative: “You pay more, but you buy proven quality and global support.”
Tactics: peer-reviewed publications, regulatory approvals, KOL endorsements, global branding campaigns.
Weakness: high costs; limited competitiveness in purely price-sensitive markets.
7. Integrated BBIU Perspective
Each block activates a different driver of perceived value:
China: Price = value. Customers accept absence of support as the trade-off.
Korea: Hybrid model. Gains credibility as a “middle power” between China’s cost advantage and USA/EU’s symbolic authority.
USA/EU: Brand and trust. Customers pay for reliability, global networks, and long-term assurance.
In consumables: China dominates; Korea competes in niches; USA/EU only win where strict regulatory standards require them.
In devices/machinery: USA/EU dominate through after-sales and symbolic trust; Korea is competitive; China struggles to overcome credibility deficits.
8. Personal Experience: Building Value Beyond Price
In every company where I worked, I saw the same temptation: employees and distributors wanted to use price as the only lever to influence customers. My approach was different. I believed that true value had to be built across education, service, communication, and authority. Over the years, this philosophy took shape in several concrete actions.
1. Localization and education of clinical staff
All product materials were translated into the local language of each territory. Beyond translation, I organized on-site training events for doctors and clinical personnel. These sessions were not only technical demonstrations but also opportunities to build relationships and trust. By investing in the knowledge of those who actually used the products, uncertainty was replaced by confidence. The brand was no longer perceived as “foreign”—it became locally relevant and respected.
2. Direct engagement through digital channels
I personally created and managed Facebook pages for the companies I represented. On these channels, I regularly published educational content, updates from medical events, and material designed to retain audience attention. This was not one-way promotion: it created a feedback loop from the field, showing us what worked, what created confusion, and what required adjustment. The result was a brand image that was approachable, transparent, and modern—a rarity in biopharma at the time.
3. Strengthening after-sales service
A product’s value does not end at the moment of purchase. For devices and machinery, after-sales support defines whether customers see a company as reliable or risky. I worked to educate distributor after-sales engineers through annual training sessions, raising their technical capacity. At the same time, I implemented a spare-parts stock system, ensuring that the most frequently needed components were available based on the installed base in each country. This reduced downtime for critical equipment to a maximum of two weeks. Customers perceived this as a mark of quality: they were not just buying a product, but joining a system that would not abandon them.
4. Acting as a Key Opinion Leader (KOL)
Finally, I went beyond local markets by participating as a speaker and trainer at international medical congresses. I presented evidence, gave lectures, and conducted hands-on workshops. By standing on stage as a KOL, I was not only promoting a product but also building scientific credibility for the company itself. This visibility and prestige could never be achieved through discount-driven tactics. Doctors, distributors, and competitors recognized that the brand was not simply “selling”—it was leading and teaching.
The Consequences
These actions consistently reshaped how customers perceived value:
Doctors and clinical staff associated the brand with knowledge and reliability, not risk.
Digital presence made the brand approachable and modern, open to dialogue.
After-sales systems converted potential frustrations into evidence of professionalism.
International congress participation elevated the company’s image into the realm of scientific authority.
Together, these pillars created a brand identity rooted in trust, service, and education—proving that long-term success comes not from lowering prices, but from building value in every layer of the customer experience.
9. Conclusion and BBIU Insight
The evidence is clear: reducing perceived value to price alone leads to erosion—of margins, of trust, of identity. Whether in consumables or in complex machinery, whether in China, Korea, or the USA/EU, the principle holds: price is only one switch, not the entire system.
The companies that consistently win are those that build multi-layered value:
Functional value through robust products and services.
Emotional value through trust and responsiveness.
Symbolic value through authority, branding, and leadership.
BBIU Insight
Companies that invest in education, communication, and after-sales systems consistently outperform those that rely solely on price. This pattern holds across geographies and product types, from consumables to complex medical devices. Crucially, higher perceived value gives firms the ability to correct their pricing mid-term—capturing sustainable margins—rather than depending on constant discounts to reach quarterly sales targets.
Annex – Cross-Industry Case Studies
1. Failure Case – Boeing 737 MAX (Aerospace)
Context: Launched as a cost-efficient upgrade to compete with Airbus A320neo. Boeing marketed the aircraft as a quick, inexpensive solution for airlines with minimal retraining for pilots.
Initial Perceived Value: Promised lower operating costs, faster adoption, and competitive pricing.
Reality After Launch: Two fatal crashes revealed flaws in the MCAS system. Investigations showed that shortcuts were taken to reduce costs and speed approvals, undermining safety.
Outcome: Global grounding of the fleet, billions in losses, reputational collapse. Airlines and passengers lost trust, showing that low training costs and “easy price savings” cannot substitute for structural safety.
Lesson: In high-risk industries, perceived value must rest on trust and safety, not cost-cutting.
2. Success Case – Apple iPhone Ecosystem (Technology)
Context: First launched in 2007, entering a market dominated by Nokia, Blackberry, and Motorola.
Initial Perceived Value: More expensive than competitors but positioned as a premium device with superior user experience.
Reality After Launch: Apple reinforced value by building an ecosystem (App Store, iCloud, regular updates, global after-sales). Customers accepted higher prices because the experience extended beyond the device.
Outcome: Apple captured global symbolic leadership. Customers became loyal to the ecosystem, not just the product.
Lesson: By investing in branding, service, and symbolic authority, Apple transformed perceived value into long-term pricing power, escaping the “commodity trap” of phones-as-hardware.
3. Failure Case – Kodak and Digital Cameras (Photography)
Context: Kodak invented the first digital camera in 1975 but chose not to pursue it aggressively, fearing cannibalization of its film business.
Initial Perceived Value: Brand trusted worldwide for film and print. Customers associated Kodak with memories and reliability.
Reality After Market Shift: Competitors like Canon, Sony, and Nikon moved into digital cameras. Kodak relied on film pricing and brand nostalgia but failed to build perceived value in digital.
Outcome: Kodak filed for bankruptcy in 2012.
Lesson: Perceived value cannot rest on past reputation alone. Without innovation and communication of new value, even iconic brands collapse.
4. Success Case – Tesla Model S and Supercharger Network (Automotive)
Context: Entered the EV market dominated by skepticism and range anxiety.
Initial Perceived Value: Expensive cars, marketed as luxury performance vehicles.
Reality After Launch: Tesla combined functional value (longer range, acceleration) with infrastructure support (Supercharger network), and emotional-symbolic value (climate leadership, visionary branding).
Outcome: Customers justified premium prices because Tesla offered not just a car, but an entire ecosystem of trust and convenience.
Lesson: Building symbolic leadership and infrastructure around a product transforms perception from “expensive car” to “future-proof mobility.”
5. Failure Case – WeWork IPO Collapse (Business Services)
Context: Marketed as a revolutionary tech company disrupting office real estate.
Initial Perceived Value: Branded as innovation-driven, community-focused, more than just office rentals.
Reality After Scrutiny: Financials revealed unsustainable losses; governance issues (Adam Neumann’s leadership) destroyed credibility. Customers realized WeWork was essentially a landlord with inflated branding.
Outcome: IPO canceled in 2019, valuation dropped from $47B to under $10B, massive restructuring.
Lesson: Symbolic marketing without functional and financial substance collapses when tested by the market.
BBIU Synthesis
Boeing 737 MAX & WeWork: failures from reducing value to cost and narrative without substance.
Apple & Tesla: successes by layering functional, emotional, and symbolic value, justifying higher long-term pricing.
Kodak: a cautionary tale of inaction—failure to evolve perceived value with changing realities.
Core takeaway: Across industries, the companies that survive and thrive are those that continuously reinforce perceived value through trust, service, innovation, and symbolic leadership, rather than relying on price or legacy reputation.
